One candidate sees the superbly timed if unplanned pregnancy of Sarah Palin's 17-year-old daughter as a private matter, the other as a media opportunity. Obama is right, but Bristol Palin's situation does highlight her mother's political stance in favour of something called "abstinence-only sex education".
I'm asking: is there any such thing?
This post by a health educator reports that in in her experience what is offered under the label is simply propaganda, not even covering the basic anatomy, with no attempt made to assess the impact on students, and doesn't deserve the name of education at all. Studies like this have unsurprisingly shown this line to be ineffective.
Mind you, the mainstream approach is overall a disaster as well. The USA has just about the highest rate of teenage births in the rich-country OECD world, though it's declining pretty much everywhere. This graph, the most recent I could find, is from 1998:
The same pattern held in 2002 and there's little reason to think the ranking has changed since.
The Bush Administration, averting its shocked eyes from the horrid facts, apparently won't cooperate in international efforts to measure the sexual behaviour of young people. However, there's no real reason to think that American teenagers are much more active sexually than those in Europe. What they are is less careful and selective. (A possible exception is the matriarchal family culture of poor urban African-Americans, in which early motherhood may become a sign of adult status, and teenage pregnancies deliberate; but that can't account for much of the difference, as AAs only make up 13-14% of the the US population and only a minority within this minority live in urban ghettoes.) The high abortion rate in the USA confirms the obvious truth that an awful lot of teenage pregnancies - probably most - are unwanted. So good sex education should make a difference.
What is good sex education? To quote the American Psychological Association:
Based on over 15 years of research, the evidence shows that comprehensive sexuality education programs for youth that encourage abstinence, promote appropriate condom use, and teach sexual communication skills reduce HIV-risk behavior and also delay the onset of sexual intercourse.So good means comprehensive, sensitive, and realistic: covering the biological bases and contraceptive techniques, but also relationships, the values that attach to them, peer pressures, and the conduct of the sexual negotiations in which young people will inevitably be involved. In Denmark (subwall), teenagers practice rolling condoms over each other's thumbs. Anything less thumbs-on is not serious.
As a thought experiment, try to imagine a pro-abstinence argument for heterosexual teenagers within (NB:
not instead of) such a proper sex education. This would be based on
Dawkins' selfish genes. The sermon's talking points go roughly like
this:
I don't really see this taking off. As a teaching plan, it's above the heads of many teenagers, given the poor state of science knowledge, and too rational to affect attitudes - but it could be kept in the pocket for the smartasses at the top of the class, such as the offspring of RBC readers. A simple appeal to the teenagers' sense of autonomy and self-worth surely works better for most.
The abstinence-only crowd won't like it either: the sermon is far too difficult and rational, and assumes the truth of Darwinism. Also, my argument can't disguise the fact that the rational case for monogamous marriage is very much stronger than that for premarital abstinence. In fact premarital experimentation, now almost universal, looks a sensible strategy to ensure married sexual happiness. We still have loveless marriages, but fewer sexless ones.
FWIW, if your reference point is the Gospels, Jesus was nearly silent on fornication and notoriously socialised with prostitutes, but was oddly fierce against the serial polygamy enabled (for men) by the casual divorce common to contemporary Jews and Romans. This is a long way from the values of the current Christian Right in America; de facto, they support premarital abstinence and easy divorce, a scheme which is more Muslim than Christian.